Dear
ASU Advocate Friend,
First and foremost,
I want to thank all of you for your help in the recently adjourned
legislative session. When we asked for your help to send an email
action alert to your legislators, you generated hundreds of emails
on issues that were important to Arizona State University.
Last July,
we started with 298 advocates as of today, we now have 1155 advocates — a
288% increase! Thank you for recruiting members to the Sun Devil
Advocate Network! As you will read in the legislative update
from Scott Smith, Director of State and Local Relations for ASU,
he talks about the success we had at the legislature this year
and thanks largely to your help, the legislature made higher
education and ASU a priority in 2005.
Legislative
Update
123 days after
it began, the First Regular Session of the 47th Legislature adjourned
sine die shortly before 1:30 a.m. on Friday, May 13, 2005. In
short, the 2005 legislative session was a success for Arizona
State University as it resulted in the state significantly increasing
its investment in ASU. We are very grateful to the governor and
legislative leaders for their efforts this session.
Please note
that as of this writing the state budget has not been approved
by the governor. Thus, the following budgetary items are contingent
upon her approval. The fiscal year (FY) 2006 state budget that
the legislature sent to the governor includes a $12.6 million
investment in ASU for enrollment growth; a $1 million investment
in ASU for the establishment of our Bioinformatics Department;
and, a $6 million investment in the University of Arizona for
the establishment of a medical campus in downtown Phoenix. Exactly
half of the Bioinformatics and the medical school investments
are contingent upon the Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) reporting
to the legislature on the plans for the downtown medical campus.
The budget
package also includes Senate Bill 1517 (Higher Education Budget).
This legislation contains numerous provisions relating to higher
education, including:
-
A $4 million
annual investment, from FY-06 through FY-10, to the universities
and community colleges to facilitate the production of nursing
graduates.
- The creation of a credit hour threshold to eliminate
state funding for students carrying excess credits. The
threshold becomes effective in FY-07 and is phased in
over three fiscal years.
- The requirement for the Arizona Board of Regents to
study the feasibility of limiting tuition increases for
continuing students to no more than inflation and report
its findings to the legislature.
Earlier versions
of the budget bills, as well as a separate piece of legislation,
proposed limiting future tuition increases to inflation for continuing
students. On the surface such a proposal would seem reasonable;
however, the measure would have had devastating consequence for
ASU. Given the recent enrollment growth, ASU has only been able
to maintain academic quality, and increase affordability and
accessibility, through the recent tuition increases. The establishment
of a tuition cap would have negated our advancements in these
areas, and led to even larger tuition increases for new incoming
students. We were very pleased the legislature decided to require
the Regents to study this issue and look forward to reviewing
their findings.
Another proposal
contained in previous versions of the higher education budget
bills would have established some level of legislative oversight
on third party financing of capital projects -- these are university
capital projects financed through bonds or lease purchase arrangements
with tax-exempt non-profit organizations. We appreciated the
legislature’s desire to have greater oversight of these
financing arrangements, and worked to accomplish the objective.
In the end, however, the oversight provisions were removed. Before
concluding my report, I want to review the final disposition
of several other bills relating to higher education. One of this
session’s mostly debated items was the proposal to grant
community colleges the authority to offer baccalaureate degrees.
The proposal was presented in three different bills and in various
forms, but ultimately the legislature did not approve the measure.
However, on the final night of session, Speaker Weiers announced
the establishment of the Ad Hoc Committee on Higher Education
to continue examining the issue.
House Bill
2261 (Universities; Tuition Monies; Scholarships) proposed to
prohibit the use of tuition monies for financial aid purposes.
This bill would have been devastating to the financial aid programs
administered at Arizona’s public universities. In the end,
the bill was not approved.
House Concurrent
Resolution 2029 (Taxpayer Bill of Rights) was a referendum measure
proposing maximum limits on state revenues and expenditures.
This resolution, if referred to the ballot and approved by voters,
would have amended Arizona’s constitution to place a cap
on state government spending. A spending cap would severely limit
the ability of future legislatures to make investments in the
university system. Ultimately, the measure was defeated in the
House of Representatives.
House Bill
2030 (NOW: Public Programs; Citizenship) prohibits students without
lawful immigration status from paying in-state tuition and from
receiving tuition or fee waivers, grants, scholarship assistance,
financial aid or any other types of assistance funded with state
monies. This measure was approved by the legislature and is awaiting
the Governor’s action.
In closing,
I want to reiterate that we are pleased with the outcome of the
legislative session. Our legislative endeavors would not have
been possible without the governor’s and the Arizona Legislature’s
commitment to advancing higher education in the State of Arizona.
We are very grateful and appreciate their hard work and dedicated
public service. Lastly, I want to thank the Sun Devil Advocates
Network members for your instrumental efforts which helped achieve
this positive outcome. I believe the Sun Devil Advocate Network
laid the foundation for a solid future with its 2005 legislative
efforts and I am eagerly looking forward to your involvement
in ASU’s 2006 legislative campaign.
Closing
Thoughts
Again, thank
you for signing up to be a Sun Devil Advocate and acting on the
action alerts, your help has been invaluable. Also, please stay
connected while the legislature is not in session by continuing
to read our monthly, electronic newsletter. Additionally, we
will be working hard to increase our army and get more and more
ASU supporters involved. With your help we can make the 2006
legislative session even more successful than this one.
If you have
any suggestions, comments or observations you would like to share
with us, just click on this link advoteam@sundeviladvocates.org and
let us know.
Jeff Grant,
Director of Advocacy
ASU Alumni Association
P.S. If you
want to become an active member of the ASU Alumni Association,
one of the best ways you can give back is through membership
in the ASU Alumni Association. The annual dues of $45 offer an
affordable way to help build ASU’s reputation. Visit www.asu.edu/alumni/membership or
call 1-800-ALUMNUS.
P.S.S. If you
have a different e-mail address you would prefer us to use, just
e-mail us at advoteam@sundeviladvocates.org with
your new e-mail address and we’ll make the change.
If you don’t
want to receive further issues of this electronic newsletter,
send an unsubscribe e-mail to advoteam@sundeviladvocates.org with
the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line and the message field.
|